🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord created to safeguard women from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that rights groups described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread protest both inside the country and internationally.

22,000 people have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly return the bill for additional review if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable debates in additional EU countries